AI-generated illustration; not a photograph of the reported event.
- calendar_today November 6, 2026
Democrats Inherit Conservative Changes to Texas Higher Education
For years, Texas Republicans exercised significant influence over public universities, enacting sweeping changes such as banning Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives and restricting academic topics. With a shift in political power, newly elected Democratic officials now face choices about whether to alter or uphold these reforms.
Leadership Transition Offers New Appointments But Limited Immediate Change
Governor-elect Gina Hinojosa and Lieutenant Governor-elect Vikki Goodwin, both Democrats, emphasized K-12 education during their campaigns but provided limited details on plans for higher education. Hinojosa pledged to appoint regents who would expand financial aid to cover living expenses, while the Republican-controlled Senate may still block significant policy reversals. Democrats controlling the House does not guarantee full legislative support for reversing Republican-led laws.
Expansive Conservative Reforms Under Republican Leadership
Republican lawmakers passed tough measures affecting Texas public universities well before similar policies gained national attention. These included:
- Banning DEI programs through Senate Bill 17
- Expanding grounds for firing tenured professors
- Restricting campus protests and weakening faculty senates
- Granting governor-appointed regents more control over academic decisions via Senate Bill 37
Senate Bill 37, set for full implementation in 2025, gives regents expanded authority in reviewing course requirements and hiring top university officials.
Changes in University Leadership and Planning
Hinojosa will have the opportunity to replace up to 20 university regents whose terms expire next year, affecting leadership in seven university systems including Texas A&M, the University of Texas, and Texas Tech. However, regents serve staggered six-year terms, and most sitting presidents and chancellors were appointed by outgoing Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's appointees, making immediate changes unlikely.
Notably, conservatives appointed high-profile figures as chancellors in major systems, such as Brandon Creighton at Texas Tech and former Republican lawmakers at Texas A&M and the University of Texas. Decisions by these leaders have included restricting classroom teaching on race, gender, and sexuality, and eliminating academic programs related to these topics.
Potential for Policy Adjustments and Senate Influence
State Senator Royce West, a Democrat, suggested that the legislature should examine the effects of existing laws—particularly those restricting DEI and expanding regents' power—before considering repeal. Hinojosa's choices for regents require confirmation in the Senate, where outgoing Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick previously played a strong role in vetting appointees for conservative credentials. Goodwin will assume the role of presiding over the Senate, but the body's continued Republican control could limit Democratic initiatives.
University Reactions and Faculty Concerns
University administrators enacted some restrictions more strictly than legally required, according to Michael Harris, dean at SMU. As the political environment changes, institutional leaders might reconsider some academic limitations. However, Barrett Taylor of the University of North Texas notes that supporters of conservative reforms may seek to enforce existing policies more vigorously, especially with new mechanisms like the state ombudsman's office established by SB 37.
Legal Battles and Judicial Outcomes
Attorney General-elect Nathan Johnson inherits ongoing lawsuits challenging limits on teaching about identity topics and restrictions on campus protests at universities including Texas Tech, Texas A&M, and several University of Texas campuses. Johnson has also pledged to challenge federal threats to policies like the Texas Dream Act, though the extent of possible restoration remains uncertain.
Education Funding and Policy Priorities
In recent years, education funding has been leveraged as a tool in policy debates, with state dollars threatened over DEI initiatives. The Democratic-led House could adopt new approaches, such as rewarding institutions for student progress and reducing transcript fees, though priorities remain unclear.
Hinojosa has previously supported funding models prioritizing student outcomes and opposed expanded regent authority.
Looking Ahead in Texas Higher Education
Observers suggest the leadership transition could reduce ideological conflicts in higher education policy. Some hope the focus will return to the economic value, affordability, and workforce needs associated with earning college degrees. The direction Democrats choose remains to be seen as they navigate Senate opposition and pre-existing institutional leadership.
Related coverage
Source: mysanantonio.com.
